Skip to main content

Why do I read this stuff?

I'm reading Gary Holthaus' (mostly) excellent From the Farm to the Table: What All Americans Need to Know About Agriculture and find myself burning with anger at stuff I already kinda sorta knew.  "Studies show that each year of rising agricultural exports has shown a corresponding net decline in U.S and Canadian farm prosperity" and "The traders and the corporations make more from it [farming] than the farmer does" (128-29).

That, of course, is only the beginning, he goes in to treatment of migrant workers, GMOs, and the joke that is NAFTA, WTO, and other puppet master organizations.  "Of all the grain that goes down the Mississippi on barges from the Midwest, only a tiny fraction goes to least developed countries, where hunger is the greatest...These grains are shipped to those who can best afford them, not to those most in need" (158).

"What can a layperson make of all this?  At least this: as farmers or consumers, we have to take with a grain of salt any claims that certain products will feed the world, or save the family farm, or increase production to to undreamed-of levels, thus increasing farmers' profits.  Skepticism should be the order of the day" (162).

"Nature always bats last" (180.

What, then, can states do when industry or commerce [or a sports team--SFM] says, "We need to have some tax concessions made or land donated or roads built for us, or we'll go elsewhere"?  Since such requests are the first sign that this industry will never be a responsible, contributing member of the community, sensible states and communities respond by saying, "We cannot do that.  However, what we will do is require an infrastructure tax so we can recover the expenses we will incur for the added costs required of our schools, our water and sewage infrastructure, our social workers, and our loss of social capital."  They might even add, "If you cannot afford to be a contributing citizen, we can't afford to have you in business."  If such an industry goes elsewhere, the community can heave a big sigh of relief and keep its tax savings in the bank or spend them on more worthwhile projects.  We should remind our Chamber of Commerce development committee that the purpose of economic development is not to create jobs but to create prosperity--for the community, not for an industry or two whose corporate profits go elsewhere (188).
I doubt there's one politician in Michigan with the backbone to say such a thing.  We certainly haven't said it to Hollywood--"Look, honey, we gots see-leb-ritties in town!"  There's more to this book--I'm on the chapter about NAFTA, WTO, CAFTA, and others and (confirmation bias). . . oooh, I'm feelin' apoplectic.  I'll write more when I finish.


Comments

Scot said…
Well, I finished it some time ago, but I'm not going to give any lengthy review. It is a worthwhile book for anyone who might be even marginally interested in what goes on in the ag world.

Popular posts from this blog

Mystery Meat indeed!

During my grocery shopping today I was asked to pick up some hot dogs for some meal or other. Now I am not an aficianado of the 'ot dog, but will usually have a corn dog or BBQed version of one or two during the summer. If my children like them, so be it. The trouble came when trying to find a package that didn't arrive from a chemistry lab. Nitrates and nitrites, sugars (including HFCS), the preservative sodium benzoate, and other fun substances littered every package I picked up. Even Hebrew National which "Answers to a Higher Standard" was doped. Apparently Kosher doesn't mean it can't be injected with a chemical cocktail. So-called "Natural Casings" were prominently displayed to catch my eye. As if sheep or pig intestine somehow offsets Agricorps tinkering. I ended up buying the brand "sold at Tiger Stadium" not because it was chemical-free, Hell no! It was merely the brand with the least additives. Why does a hot dog need su...

Good reads of 2009

I haven't made a list like this in a while, and I believe I discussed most of these on the blog as I finished them, but I thought I'd make a handy short-hand list for you and me. These are only in the order I read them and do not indicate any preference. The Open Door * Frederica Mathewes-Green The Children of Hurin * J.R.R. Tolkien The Omnivore's Dilemma * Michael Pollan Agrarianism and the Good Society: Land, Culture, Conflict, and Hope * Eric T. Freyfogle Wonderful Fool * Shusaku Endo Up the Rouge: Paddling Detroit's Hidden River * Joel Thurtell and Patricia Beck Johnny Cash and the Great American Contradiction: Christianity and the Battle for the Soul of a Nation * Rodney Clapp (I started the following in December, but I haven't finished them--so far they are excellent: Love and Hate in Jamestown * David A. Price and The Picture of Dorian Gray * Oscar Wilde) Try one of these--let me know.

Shutting Down the Shop

  It's been a good run, sort of. I don't see much traffic here these days, partly because I only post occasionally. But I think in some ways, blogs as they are, have become quasi-obsolete. I'm not, however, giving up writing. I'm moving. To a Substack. This one : Pilgrim of the Sweetwater Seas.  So, if you're inclined. Check it out. Subscribe--it's free until I get a certain number of subscribers (and I'm not even close to that number yet).  Anyway, thanks Blogspot for the opportunity way back in the Oughts to do this.  Maybe I'll see you, reader, over at the Pilgrim site?