Skip to main content

Surprised by Wonder

Our guest preacher this morning commented on how, during a retreat, she began to notice herons and cicadas and wildflowers and all of God's handiwork. I sat there thinking--are you kidding? When I'm driving and I spy a turkey vulture or a hawk sailing in the sky I whip my head for a better view, much like a third grader rubber-necking for a speeding, wailing fire truck. It boggles me how you cannot notice these fellow creatures. What's that 90's tune? "Where's your head at? Not to mock anyone, but seriously. . . are your eyes that filmy? Your ears too waxy?


I discovered in Last Child in the Woods that Howard Gardener (of Multiple Intelligences fame) posited that some possess a "Naturalist Intelligence." Something along the lines of having a keen awareness of the life outside our offices, shops, schools, and homes. Wanting to know how to match the words "Spotted knapweed" with the actual flower. Things along those lines.

I try not to, as Augustine cautioned, to confuse the gift with the giver, but sometimes. . . standing on the end of the Leelanau Peninisula last week, alone at dusk and waving madly at a white-tailed doe. . . I need a little intervention with my mania.

Yes, I'll discuss the fam vacay soon.

Anyway, look around people. What's that smell, sound, flash? What does sycamore bark feel like? Find out for yourself.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Once--in a self-absorbed, depressed funk--I asked my best friend (of 29 years) what I was good at. She listed several very kind things (the sorts of thing you'd hope someone who has known you for nearly your entire life would be able to say), but one thing on her list really surprised me. She said, "You're really good at noticing things. When we're out for the day together, you always see something beautiful. Most people don't, or can't, see the beauty that's around them. I know I don't. I think that's one of your best skills."

Hmmm...awareness of the natural world as a life skill. I kinda like that idea.

Anyway, all that to say, many people go through their lives unaware of the natural beauty around them. I don't think it's intentional, not a numbness they've purposely cultivated, but just the side effect of living in a society which believes that the best way to get from A to B is the quickest, most direct, way. That speed doesn't leave much time for noticing.

I think the woodland retreat the guest preacher experienced allowed her to break away from the A-to-B-to-A tyranny of life, and finally see the natural world. I wouldn't be surprised if she becomes the sort of person who gets whiplash when she sees a hawk, too.
Scot said…
Wow, Rachel two posts in a year! You're not such a wallflower, are you.

Popular posts from this blog

Worth Quoting

There are but three social arrangements which can replace Capitalism: Slavery, Socialism, and Property.                                                                                                 --Hilaire Belloc                                                                                                The Servile State

Good reads of 2009

I haven't made a list like this in a while, and I believe I discussed most of these on the blog as I finished them, but I thought I'd make a handy short-hand list for you and me. These are only in the order I read them and do not indicate any preference. The Open Door * Frederica Mathewes-Green The Children of Hurin * J.R.R. Tolkien The Omnivore's Dilemma * Michael Pollan Agrarianism and the Good Society: Land, Culture, Conflict, and Hope * Eric T. Freyfogle Wonderful Fool * Shusaku Endo Up the Rouge: Paddling Detroit's Hidden River * Joel Thurtell and Patricia Beck Johnny Cash and the Great American Contradiction: Christianity and the Battle for the Soul of a Nation * Rodney Clapp (I started the following in December, but I haven't finished them--so far they are excellent: Love and Hate in Jamestown * David A. Price and The Picture of Dorian Gray * Oscar Wilde) Try one of these--let me know.

Independent Women?

      During breakfast today I was reading an excerpt from a play in The New York Times Magazine (I know, I was a day behind and read Saturday's edition yesterday) entitled Rust .  The play, written by a professor at Grand Valley State University, here in Michigan, is a nonfiction drama about the closing of a GM plant in Wyoming, MI.  The play itself sounds interesting and I enjoyed the excerpt, but what caught my eye was something a character said.  The character is "Academic" and plays a historian and guide to the playwright, also a character.  He is explaining the rise of the automobile factories and the effect of the car on American culture.  He says, "Women became independent, they go from producers of food and clothing to consumers of food and clothing."  This was meant as an earnest, praiseworthy point.     I would counter with "How far we've fallen."  To say that a woman (or a man) is independent because she has moved from producer to cons