Skip to main content

Suburban Renewal

Kill yer grass! That's not what Doug Tallamy calls for directly in Bringing Nature Home, but he might as well have. According to his research there exists in the continental U.S. only 3-5% of undisturbed area left. Now, he doesn't quite define what this means (I take it as areas of no permanent human activity), but his point is that we have plowed under most of the habitat that used to exist here. We have plowed it under for farmland and malls, for highways and hospitals, but we've eradicated the majority of space that non-human creatures use as habitat. To make things worse in the place of native plants--which are absolutely necessary to life on this spherical rock (all plants are necessary in their proper place)--we have planted ornamentals that have no enemies here (meaning the U.S.) nothing to check their spread and therefore nothing to feed on them, plants that don't support the life that is supposed to be here.
I've covered Tallamy's doom and gloom scenario before and I won't rehash it again, because the bigger message, the more important one is that it doesn't have to be this way. If homeowners would refuse to plant exotic species (I'm not talking about vegetables here) and substitute some of their wasteland of turf grass we could attract insects. Yuck, you say? Do you like birds? Not pigeons, house sparrows, and starlings, but interesting, colorful indigenous ones? Then you need insects to attract birds. Oaks alone support 534 species (147).
Tallamy says that most species can adapt to living in proximity to humans (there are exceptions, of course, wolves and cougars come to mind) and can thrive. Think of the time you'd save forgoing some of your mowing, the fuel, the money kept. It seems simple to me, people.
Lastly, Tallamy is probably ignorant of this point, but he's preaching the Gospel. No, that's not some metaphor, that is the Gospel of Jesus the Christ--see specifically Col. 1:20. Stewarding this planet, more importantly your ecosystem, isn't the whole Gospel (how small that would be!) but it is one that many frequently ignore.
In the words of Wendell Berry--"Practice resurrection."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Worth Quoting

There are but three social arrangements which can replace Capitalism: Slavery, Socialism, and Property.                                                                                                 --Hilaire Belloc                                                                                                The Servile State

Good reads of 2009

I haven't made a list like this in a while, and I believe I discussed most of these on the blog as I finished them, but I thought I'd make a handy short-hand list for you and me. These are only in the order I read them and do not indicate any preference. The Open Door * Frederica Mathewes-Green The Children of Hurin * J.R.R. Tolkien The Omnivore's Dilemma * Michael Pollan Agrarianism and the Good Society: Land, Culture, Conflict, and Hope * Eric T. Freyfogle Wonderful Fool * Shusaku Endo Up the Rouge: Paddling Detroit's Hidden River * Joel Thurtell and Patricia Beck Johnny Cash and the Great American Contradiction: Christianity and the Battle for the Soul of a Nation * Rodney Clapp (I started the following in December, but I haven't finished them--so far they are excellent: Love and Hate in Jamestown * David A. Price and The Picture of Dorian Gray * Oscar Wilde) Try one of these--let me know.

Independent Women?

      During breakfast today I was reading an excerpt from a play in The New York Times Magazine (I know, I was a day behind and read Saturday's edition yesterday) entitled Rust .  The play, written by a professor at Grand Valley State University, here in Michigan, is a nonfiction drama about the closing of a GM plant in Wyoming, MI.  The play itself sounds interesting and I enjoyed the excerpt, but what caught my eye was something a character said.  The character is "Academic" and plays a historian and guide to the playwright, also a character.  He is explaining the rise of the automobile factories and the effect of the car on American culture.  He says, "Women became independent, they go from producers of food and clothing to consumers of food and clothing."  This was meant as an earnest, praiseworthy point.     I would counter with "How far we've fallen."  To say that a woman (or a man) is independent because she has moved from producer to cons